Free The People!
Let Your Voice Be Heard!
Get Active About The Issues!
Talking Point--Actors
Why do we continue to spend millions of dollars going to the movies, renting videos, and watching television--making the actors and producers filthy rich--only to watch them them attack, desecrate, and destroy all the good things for which we stand?
They attack the unborn, family life, good morals, and common sense. Why don't we stop making them rich, so they don't have all that money, fame, and clout to use against us? Stop going to the theaters to watch their movies, quit renting their videos, and stop watching them on television. Then write the movie makers and the outlets, and let them know why.
Bernie Parsons
Make the world a better place!
Liberals are running (and ruining) most of the public schools, yet have the arrogance to complain that they should not be forced to use public school money to accommodate Christian clubs meeting after school, and must not tolerate any talk, or any display, of Christianity on public school property. They also refuse to let the Boys Scouts use the school facilities. Many of these same school boards welcome and support homosexual groups.
Where does public school money come from? Taxpayers like you and me. Should we have a say in how that money is spent? Absolutely! Perhaps if the school boards, principals, and teachers won't abide by our wishes, we should seek those positions ourselves.
Another alternative for many parents is homeschooling or private schooling. Yet as more and more students attend these schools, the liberals cry even more loudly that "public schools are being gutted". This, despite the fact that more and more money is being pumped into the public school system all the time.
Public schools are a failure because liberals have taken them over, have stopped teaching good morals to students, and neglect basic studies in areas like math, history, and science. Instead they substitute fuzzy math, they rewrite history, and push theories like evolution and the "big bang". They promote abortion, promiscuous sex, homosexuality, extreme environmentalism, and junk science like human evolution.
Furthermore, there is no "wall of separation between church and state" in our U.S. constitution. Rather, it forbids the establishment of an official state church, as exists in some countries. At the same time, it upholds our religious freedom. What the atheists and other "academic elites" desire is freedom from religion, not freedom of religion. There is no valid reason to exclude discussions of Christianity, the Bible, or good morals from public education.
Please take a vocal, public stand on this extremely important issue. Attend school board meetings, learn what your child is being taught (many schools or teachers no longer assign homework because they don't want the parents to know what the children are being taught), and let your senators and representatives know that you expect freedom of religion, and a sound public school system. I also urge that you support school choice ("vouchers"), charter schools, and home schooling.
Also be aware that the public education system is trying to turn children against their parents by painting the parents as "old-fashioned", out of touch, or ignorant. They are also re-writing the history of America, trying to throw out information about the founding fathers and early presidents, and are playing up minority roles in the history as though these were the country's founders--or should have been. Teach your children good morals, good citizenship, and reverence for God in your own homes.
Bernie Parsons
Since the September 11, 2001, atrocity involving the destruction of about 3,000 people in the World Trade Center in Manhattan, the Pentagon, and the flight that crashed in Pennsylvania, many people in the news media and the United States government have quickly declared Islam to be a peaceful religion, and Muslims a peaceful people. They say that only a small handful of terrorists have perverted the doctrine of Islam in order to wreak terror. This is not true--Islam is historically a brutal and repressive religion.
As I researched the causes of oppression in the world, I discovered that most of the oppression is done by Muslims who want to force everyone to worship according to Islam. They use death, violence, genital mutilation, and threats of death to force people into their religion. Those who don't "convert" are executed, starved to death, or violently terrorized. In fact, most acts of terrorism in the world are committed by Islamic extremists.
Most of the "civil wars" in the world today are caused by rebellious, violent Islamic terrorists who want to declare their independence and form their own "Islamic nations" within the borders of other countries. (A similar attempt was made by black Muslims in America in the 1960's and 1970's.) Their ultimate goal is to have the entire world be of the Islamic faith. They are not content to interact with people of other religions within a given country. When the countries, quite naturally, resist these so-called "freedom fighters"--who are nothing more than terrorists--the Muslims then whine and complain about being persecuted, while they are the very ones carrying out terrorist destruction. They starve and oppress their own citizens and fellow Muslims, keeping them in ignorance, poverty, disease, and despair.
I keep reading of objections by Muslims that they have been stereotyped as being violent and abusive. I have been reading daily news on the Internet since 1999, and have found that there is a good reason for this "stereotype". Their brutal and repressive regimes around the world are destroying their own people, driving them into poverty and despair. They wish to export this brutality to all the world, all the while blaming those who love freedom and democracy for their own problems. The mass murders of about 3,000 citizens that took place on September 11, 2001, in the United States of America, should explain once and for all time why they are so "stereotyped". If these people wanted to sincerely be known as non-violent and tolerant, they would call upon their Islamic brethren to cease their terrorist ways, rather than condemning those who report the truth. Why did not the millions of Muslims in America take to the streets with signs and banners deploring the atrocity of September 11, 2001? They speak of their fear of being harmed by "hate crimes"--yet they do not condemn the "hate crime" against America by their Muslim brethren.
The truth is that they celebrate the "destruction of the infidels", as they consider the non-Muslim world. That is why they celebrated the destruction of the World Trade Center twin towers, and the resultant massive loss of innocent lives. Yet, when retaliation was mentioned, they began to denounce America's plans to "kill innocent civilians". If they kill non-Muslims, it is the justified destruction of infidels, according to their religion.. If we kill them, it is the slaughter of innocent civilians. Their war is a religious war, and it is not merely the work of a small band of madmen. It is the belief of an entire religion. There may be a few Muslims scattered about who do not want the death of Americans and Christians, but the majority do. All you had to do was to watch their world-wide celebrations after the WTC attacks to understand that this is their goal, their dream, their religion. (By the way, the news media quickly pulled all footage of those celebrations and stopped reporting on them, in order to hide the true attitude of the majority of Muslims. They know that if Americans and Christians learn the true intentions of the Islamic people, there would be a worldwide religious war.)
American liberal news outlets add to the cover-up of what the Muslims are doing by describing Muslim terrorists in Kosovo as "ethnic Albanians"--if they are Albanians, why aren't they in Albania?--and the Muslim terrorists in Chechnya as merely Chechens. Their religion, and the reason for their war, is never mentioned. They are at war with Russia because they tried to break away and form an independent Islamic nation. They bombed and killed innocent civilians in Russia--about 400 in Moscow at one time--in order to seek their independence. In the anti-Israeli terrorism, they are simply referred to as "Palestinians". The news media always cast the Muslims as being oppressed by Israel and the United States of America. The truth is that they oppress their own citizens, not we, and they attack their own countries whenever those countries are not ruled by fanatical Muslims.
Here are some of the places you may see or hear in the news where the Muslims are creating terror: the United States of America, Israel, Sudan, Russia, Chechnya, Tajikistan, Macedonia, Turkey, Kosovo, Indonesia, Philippines, Malaysia, Pakistan, Kashmir, India, Afghanistan, Egypt, Algeria, Nigeria, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Somalia, and almost every country on the African continent and in the Middle East.
They are responsible for the mass murder of thousands of Americans in the airplane hijackings and attacks on September 11, 2001, on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon; the February 26, 1993, truck bombing of World Trade Center in the United States; the passenger plane crash at Lockerbie, Scotland; and most other world-wide terrorist bombings, kidnappings, and murders.
Please ask your senators, representatives, and President to stand up against this terrorist threat. Read Usama bin Laden's Declaration of War on Americans
For years we have heard the clamor for more money to research AIDS, come up with a cure for the disease, and to vaccinate against getting the disease. This, although AIDS spending far exceeds spending to research other, more deadly diseases. What is not being discussed are the primary causes of AIDS being spread around the world.
Homosexuality is the primary way that AIDS is spread. A secondary method is the use of shared needles by drug addicts. The liberal answer to these problems? Teach homosexuals to use condoms (that don't always work), and come up with treatments and vaccinations for them. Give drug addicts clean needles. Let the ordinary, law-abiding, God-fearing citizen fund all of this.
What is missing from this approach is any condemnation of the destructive lifestyle of the homosexual and the drug addict. If uninfected people would marry uninfected people and stay married all of their lives, they would not have the fear of getting this disease. What about the spread of the disease among heterosexuals? This is a relatively small group, compared to homosexuals. How are they getting it? Behaving as bi-sexuals, visiting prostitutes, having multiple sexual partners, or sharing needles with other drug addicts.
Change the lifestyle and the destructive behavior of the homosexuals, the promiscuous heterosexuals, and the drug addicts, and the AIDS problem goes away. Why isn't anyone tackling the issue from the perspective of good morality? Could it be because it is not "politically correct" and smacks of "religion"? We bring this blight upon ourselves.
In Africa, citizens are dying from AIDS by the hundreds of thousands. All I have heard is how "the world" must "help" by sending them billions of dollars. I have never heard anyone say that we must teach them what causes AIDS. Again, I hear that we must teach them about condoms, and about sharing dirty needles. Why not teach them to have only one marriage partner, to be faithful to that partner, and to stop using drugs and commiting homosexuality?
I was never a Boy Scout, so I have no personal ax to grind. However, what the homosexual and liberal communities are doing to this organization is appalling, and they should not get away with it. Homosexuals and their liberal political friends are fighting tooth and nail to have the Boy Scouts pander to homosexuals.
Homosexuals have a history of going where their prey is easily found and their degenerate lifestyle can be hidden. This includes schools, social services, churches, and the Scouts--anywhere they have a steady supply of innocent young people upon which to prey. Our vulnerable youth are then subjected to seduction, often coupled with intimidation, by the very people that they trust to protect and lead them.
What upsets me even more is that organizations like the National Education Association (NEA), the teachers' union, are in bed with the homosexual groups like Gay Lesbian Straight Education Network (GLSEN), Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, the Human Rights Campaign, a 3-year-old group called Scouting for All, and other homosexual rights advocacy organizations. Of course the ACLU, that nemesis of all that is good and right, is in the thick of the fight to pervert our children. The teachers' union, NEA, has long advocated introducing young children to the delights of homosexuality. This is the same teacher leadership group that promotes promiscuous sex among teenagers, then advocates abortion to take care of any "mistakes". The NEA and their liberal colleagues on school boards are brow-beating the Scouts because of their stand against homosexuality. And we trust these people to teach our children!?!
It would be a terrible tragedy for families if they succeed in overwhelming the Boy Scouts, or any other organization that stands for decency, with their assault. Please write your congressmen to resist the homosexual movement.
The National Education Association (NEA) has a long history of promoting the agenda of homosexuals. Their President, Bob Chase, has publicly taken a stand in favor of homosexuals in the public school system--teachers, as well as students. He keeps saying that we need to be more "tolerant" of them, but his organization's stance has been to promote the homosexual lifestyle. They have even recommended that teachers encourage students to experiment with homosexual relationships as a "normal" part of growing up.
Furthermore, the NEA is a union. They want to control the curricula in the schools, and want large amounts of money funneled into the failing public school system. This money is to increase teachers' salaries-- much of which is returned to the NEA in the form of dues, and is then used to promote liberal politicians and policies--often to the dismay of their own members, who have no say over this practice. They also want more money to increase spending on their pet projects and questionable teaching techniques.
The NEA is totally against meaningful school reform of any kind. They vehemently and ardently oppose vouchers, criticize private schools, and fight charter schools tooth-and-nail, unless they can control them. They have even attempted to stop home-schooling. They reject accountability for teachers and students, resisting valid testing for either group.
Their "sister" union, the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), is no better.
Parents and responsible community members must acquaint themselves with the teachers' unions' agenda, and repulse their attack on morality and accountability. I urge you to get involved with the local school boards, make sure that you know what your children are being taught, and contact your senators and representatives about your concerns.
I have always urged individuals, groups, and companies to donate to charitable causes. Over time, and especially since the terrorist attacks in America on 09/11/2001, it has become apparent that several of the largest charities have not dealt with donations responsibly. In fact, I suspect that much of what we give is taken to feed the bureaucratic backbone of most of these "charities", rather than to help those in need. I ask that before you give to any charity, check out their background, their philosophies, and their current and future plans. Ask them for information, but also check them out at their Web sites, and go to the search engines and charity "watchdog" sites to see what others on the Internet are saying about them.
If you don't like what you see and hear, e-mail, write, or call the offending charities to voice your concerns. Tell them that you will withhold future donations if they don't scale back their bureaucracies, and see to it that almost all the money goes to needy recipients.
Don't overlook donations to your local church, if it assists the needy. Also, contribute directly to people in need as you encounter them. I am not sure that feeding the big charities is the right thing to do, unless they get their act together and start helping those in need.